FLIR

Defense Industry Round Up

by

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine, Israel’s offensive in the West Bank, North Korea calling a US movie an act of war, the latest in Iran, and US troops going back to Iraq suggest there may finally be upside to a defense budget that has experienced nothing but pressure since peak spending at $691 billion in 2010 (see grey bar in image below, from left to right). Image Source: US DoD Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Request With the markets making new highs seemingly every week, bargains have become more difficult to find. We point members to ideas in the Best Ideas portfolio and Dividend Growth portfolio, but an increasingly more uncertain geopolitical backdrop–where defense spending upside is growing more and more … Read more

Valuentum Economic Castleâ„¢ Rating Update

by

Read: Keeping the Horse Before the Cart: Valuentum’s Economic Castle™ Rating The Economic Castle Focuses on the Magnitude of Economic Value Creation The Valuentum Economic Castle™ rating is an enhancement of the competitive advantage framework (commonly known as economic moat analysis) that has become widespread and ubiquitous within the investing world. Whereas an economic moat framework evaluates a firm on the basis of the sustainability and durability of its competitive advantages, Valuentum’s Economic Castle™ rating evaluates a firm on the basis of the firm’s future economic profit spread (return on invested capital less its weighted average cost of capital). The companies with the strongest Valuentum Economic Castle™ ratings are poised to generate the most economic value for shareholders in the … Read more

Evaluating the Outlook for Defense Stocks

by

The defense industry is home to a number of large defense contractors—General Dynamics (GD), Lockheed Martin (LMT), Northrop Grumman (NOC) and Raytheon (RTN)—that have significant project/intellectual know-how, long-term customer/government ties, and widespread integration expertise that cannot be easily replicated by many smaller contractors. This gives established, large defense contractors a leg up on bidding for new government contracts and optimizing the margin profile for many through cost cutting and productivity enhancements. Still, competing budget priorities within the overall US budget and within the US defense budget itself will pose both challenges and opportunities for much of the group. However, long-term cybersecurity and national security risks aren’t going away, and this will ensure that the group has a steady share of … Read more

Boeing’s Fourth-Quarter Results Were Disappointing But We’re Not Worried about the Strength of Commercial Aerospace

by

On Wednesday, aerospace and defense bellwether Boeing (BA) reported relatively disappointing fourth-quarter results. Revenue advanced 7% in the period, but core operating earnings were flat versus the prior-year quarter due to a 50 basis-point headwind in its core operating margin. Our experience with Boeing is that the firm tends to face share-price pressure when financing or emerging-market scares become prominent, the latter taking center stage in recent days—the Argentine peso collapsed and the South African rand continues to face pressure due to an unexpected rate hike. News about China—including a slowdown in manufacturing, banking concerns, and a sizzling (but more vulnerable) real estate market—isn’t helping either. Boeing is more exposed to these “news” items than most companies, particularly given the … Read more

Surveying 3Q Performance from the Large Defense Contractors

by

Northrop Grumman Executes Nicely in 3Q But Reveals Declining Backlog On Wednesday, Northrop Grumman (NOC) reported strong third-quarter results considering the competing budget priorities in Washington and the subsequent difficult revenue environment. The defense contractor’s revenue dropped 2.6%, as expected, but its segment operating income increased 4.5% thanks to roughly 90 basis points of segment operating margin improvement. Third-quarter diluted earnings per share leapt 17.6%, and free cash flow swelled to $860 million (14.1% of sales), up from $748 million (11.9% of sales). We very much liked the profitability improvements and its increased free-cash-flow conversion during the period, but the firm’s backlog performance in the quarter wasn’t stellar: As of September 30, 2013, total backlog was $37.5 billion compared with … Read more

Flashback 2008: Brian Nelson and Pat Dorsey — the Morningstar Years

by

We think it’s important to know the people you’re working with at Valuentum. We’re not some robot behind the scenes that only lives in the Internet. We’re hard-working individuals with families just like you. Let’s take a flashback in time to when Valuentum’s current President of Equity Research Brian Nelson called for Boeing’s shares to hit $110 in 2008, while he was working as a Senior Analyst at Morningstar. Shares are just a few dollars away from that level today. Source: http://www.youtube.com/user/MorningstarInc?feature=watch << Learn more about Brian Nelson, CFA Aerospace & Defense – Prime: BA, FLIR, GD, LLL, LMT, NOC, RTN Aerospace Suppliers: AIR, ATRO, COL, HEI, HXL, PCP, SPR, TDY, TXT

Headline Risk Entering the Market

by

The summer months have been relatively uneventful, with the exception of concerns relating to the Federal Reserve’s coming tapering of its bond-buying program and quibbles between hedge fund giants over a company that makes protein shakes—we’re talking about Herbalife (HLF) in the latter example. Even the sequester proved to be a largely underwhelming event so far through 2013. As a result, the market has focused on fundamentals, awarding strong performance and punishing poor performance (almost irrespective of valuation parameters). However, the market remains fully valued at current levels, with the forward price-to-earnings ratio on S&P 500 companies in-line with its 10-year average at 14.1 times, and the distribution of our Valuentum Buying Index ratings tilting decidedly negative. The forward price-to-earnings … Read more

Nelson: The 16 Most Important Steps To Understand The Stock Market

by

A previous version of this article appeared on our website July 21, 2013. Refreshed and updated throughout, as of July 2018. By Brian Nelson, CFA After earning my MBA at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and training stock and credit analysts from large organizations over the past decade or so, I have heard just about every question (though I admit I am still surprised by many things and remain a very humble student of the markets). I’ve also spent years perfecting the discounted cash flow process for large research organizations such as Morningstar and studied under one of the most famed aggressive growth investors of all time, Richard Driehaus. My knowledge runs the gamut from value through … Read more

Top Research and Ideas You May Have Missed

by

Is Quant Value Giving Intrinsic Value Investors a Bad Name? Surely, you don’t believe Warren Buffett’s “style” is out of favor? By Brian Nelson, CFA I need to make sure that you’re aware of something very important. The media and perhaps many investment professionals define the concept of “value” as companies with low price-to-book (P/B) ratios, and the concept of “growth” as companies with high price-to-book ratios. This definition of “value” and “growth” and their corresponding returns have been magnified in writings throughout the media and across quantitative research, even in prestigious journals. Warren Buffett has been rallying against most quantitative applications and how “growth” and “value” are defined in popular media and quantitative research for decades.  Here’s one of the Oracle’s most … Read more