KMI

A 10%+ Cost of Capital for Midstream Equities Is Reality

by

Kinder Morgan (KMI) disclosed how it would raise much-needed financing October 26, and our worst fears were realized: The marginal cost of raising capital in the midstream space has soared. As recently as earlier this year, Kinder Morgan’s executive team had been guiding analysts to a 3.3% cost of capital (“hurdle rate”), a level we had outlined was absolutely ludicrous (see page 28 here). The 3.3% mark broke down into a 4.1% yield on equity and a 2.4% cost of debt, evenly split. Those days are now over.   Kinder Morgan recently announced that it would float $1.6 billion in mandatory convertible preferred stock, effectively “delayed” issuance of equity capital, which would carry a stated interest rate of 9.75%. Management … Read more

Nelson: Time to Consider Buying Kinder Morgan?

by

“Buy and hold investing has done more to turn perfectly decent people into the worst sort.” As others are poo-pooing Kinder Morgan’s (KMI) third-quarter report, we wanted to share a few observations. Our $29 per share fair value estimate for the corporate is unchanged, as we note the low end of our fair value range is $23 per share. We’re reiterating our “neutral” view on the company. First, we were beyond pleased to see Executive Chairman Richard Kinder come to terms with emphasizing the fact that Kinder Morgan is not totally immune to commodity price impacts. He said as much in the press release. Though top analysts on Wall Street are well-aware of this (or they should be), there are … Read more

Flash: Kinder Morgan Cuts Dividend Growth Outlook

by

Per the company’s third-quarter report, released October 21, 2015: “while we are at the beginning of our budget process for 2016, we currently expect to increase our declared dividend for 2016 by 6 to 10 percent over the 2015 declared dividend of $2.00 per share.” The previous target had called for a 10% increase versus the lowered midpoint of 8%.

Transaction Alerts: Moving Closer to Market Neutral on Energy

by

The Best Ideas Newsletter portfolio has generated significant outperformance in part from avoiding many of the landmines across the energy sector during the past many months. We’ve done equally well in our calls in the Dividend Growth Newsletter portfolio, and we’re very proud of raising the issue of the importance of looking at non-GAAP free cash flow across pipeline entities. We believe that such a measure is the best one to assess the timing of free cash flows as they are generated, an important consideration for investors of all types, and not properly addressed in measures of distributable cash flow or a company’s dividend or distribution. Why are we now inching ever so slightly back into energy? 1. The market … Read more

Thank You for the Victory Lap Barron’s!

by

For those that saw the reference to our recent article in Barron’s and the unfortunate, derogatory counter-punch by another author, we appreciate the support and congratulations! The Barron’s article highlighting our work was a victory lap on our call on Kinder Morgan, or we think most should have interpreted it as such. The recognition was well-received by existing members and interested new members alike! How to interpret our call on Kinder Morgan >> As many of you know, however, the call on Kinder Morgan has been off the table for some time now. We had recently moved to “neutral” on Kinder Morgan (see here), after shares collapsed from $40 to $29, which is our current fair value estimate of the firm … Read more

Understanding Your MLP’s Financially-Engineered Equity Value

by

For background on this topic, please read “5 Reasons Why Kinder Morgan Will Collapse,” and “5 More Reasons Why Kinder Morgan Will Collapse.” In this article, we will synthetically create the equivalent of a master limited partnership (MLP), called iNewCorp with Kinder Morgan’s financial profile, from scratch with effectively no capital at all, with only a strong credit rating. In such an example, we’ll also explain how valuation techniques cannot ignore growth capital in the valuation equation of MLPs or other midstream corporates by pricing them on a multiple of “distributable cash flow” or on the dividend/distribution that follows it. We’ll do so by contemplating the value of a company that has a “distributable cash flow” stream requiring maintenance (and/or … Read more

FAQ: Regarding your article, “Warning: The Master Limited Partnership Business Model May Not Survive…”

by

Q: Regarding your article, “Warning: The Master Limited Partnership Business Model May Not Survive,” – what are you basing your comments on financial engineering the dividend on? It seems to me that Energy Transfer Equity has enough free cash flow to cover its dividend with a 1.2x coverage ratio. Am I missing something? A: Thank you for your question. Most master limited partnerships and midstream corporates do not cover their distributions and dividends, respectively, on a traditional free cash flow basis, as measured by cash flow from operations less all capital spending. That means that such payouts are being financed in part, some more than others, from the cash flow from financing section of the cash flow statement, hence the term financially-engineered. … Read more

Warning: The Master Limited Partnership Business Model May Not Survive

by

Warren Buffett has famously said that, “only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.” We now know what’s been swimming naked, and it’s the master limited partnership (MLP) business model during the latest downdraft of this energy cycle. A tremendous fall-out may still be ahead for MLPs, unfortunately, as energy markets weaken and as credit markets tighten. We now believe the financial operating structure of the MLP may not survive in its current form, even as we say that most businesses using the MLP model are good ones. Our view continues to be that most master limited partnerships including Energy Transfer Partners (ETP) and most midstream corporate business models including Kinder Morgan (KMI) are dependent … Read more

Setting the Record Straight on Kinder Morgan

by

Most, if not all, MLPs report distributable cash flow (DCF), which does not in the calculation consider growth capex, an important driver behind the generation of increased cash flow from operations in the future. When MLPs report distribution coverage ratios, this particular calculation also backs out growth capex from the equation, instead using only ‘sustaining capital expenditures.’ There are a number of contractual reasons why the data is presented in such a way, but from a valuation standpoint, we’ve always taken an issue with the MLP universe being implicitly valued on a future distributable cash flow stream that “covers” the distribution than on future free operating cash flow, which is a better measure of the free operating cash flow that … Read more