Amazon Drops $40 Per Share
July 25, 2014
Amazon (AMZN) continues to focus on taking market share and damaging its competitors rather than generating large accounting profits and cash flows. The company’s cash-flow generation should improve if investments turn out to be profitable (and management turns off the expense gushers), but the company remains a low-margin retailing operation. The market has recently grown impatient with the executive suite’s lack of profit focus, and reaction to its second-quarter results, released Thursday, couldn’t have made this point more clear. For a company that boasts a market capitalization of ~$146 billion, one would think the firm is highly profitable. For Amazon, however, this just isn’t the case. We explain why the firm garners such an elevated valuation (despite meager profits) in
Financial Analysis 501: Why Value Is Always Based on Future Expectations
July 25, 2014
A version of this article appeared on our website October 25, 2013. On October 24, 2013, Amazon (AMZN) reported better-than-expected fiscal third-quarter results. Let’s take a look at the firm’s income statement and cash flow statement to explain why value is always based on future expectations of earnings and free cash flow. The concept of value is not based on a firm’s most recent-quarterly performance or its past performance. Amazon currently sports a market capitalization of $166.3 billion as of the time of this writing. Income Statement << What Is the Income Statement? Image Source: Amazon For a company that records $17.1 billion in revenue (the third line down called ‘total net sales’), Amazon’s quarterly ‘loss before income taxes’ of $43 million (negative
Ford Surprises to the Upside; GM Distracted By Recalls
July 24, 2014
Sometimes it’s easy to fall in love with a company and its products. This, unfortunately, can become a behavioral and psychological barrier to financial outperformance. Whether you are a Ford or Chevy guy or gal determines little about how successful you will be as an investor in auto stocks. The most important determinant to financial outperformance in the auto space is not based on which type of car or truck you drive (or like), but instead, it is based on understanding and capitalizing on the factors that drive stock prices. To this point, stock prices are driven, of course, by the buying and selling of shares, and the buying and selling of shares is primarily influenced by a company’s intrinsic
Earnings from 5 Dividend Growth Giants
July 24, 2014
Let’s evaluate the recent quarterly results of five traditional dividend growth plays. Please be sure to access the 16-page reports and dividend reports of the firms included in this article. If you are interested in receiving the valuation models of companies, please let us know. Coca-Cola (KO) There are few companies fundamentally stronger than Coca-Cola. The firm boasts a number of competitive advantages: its brands, financial strength, distribution system, global reach, and a deep executive bench. It has raised its dividend in each of the past 50+ years, and we expect dividend growth to continue at a high-single-digit annual pace for the foreseeable future. Though the strength of Coca-Cola’s competitive position is undeniable, we don’t expect the ‘cola wars’ with
How We Add Incremental Value to Your Research and Analysis on Apple
July 23, 2014
There’s a lot we can talk about with respect to Apple’s solid fiscal third-quarter results–and we will–but the most important takeaway from this article is how we strive to add incremental value to your research and analysis of the iPhone giant. First of all, we don’t play the quarterly earnings beat-or-miss game at Valuentum. You can read about how we think about near-term forecasts and what we think are the most important drivers behind a firm’s long-term intrinsic value here. Most sell-side analysts and commentators spend the majority of their time analyzing factors that impact the company’s financial performance (not necessarily its stock price) over the next couple years, a time frame that generally accounts for ~20% of a company’s total
Nelson’s Video Clip on CNBC Asia’s Street Signs
July 23, 2014
“Brian Nelson, President of Equity Research at Valuentum Securities, explains why the latest food safety scandal won’t have a lasting impact on McDonald’s and Yum Brands.” — CNBC Please select here to view video.
Holy Guacamole! McDonald’s Wishing It Had Kept Chipotle
July 22, 2014
Very few investors probably remember that Chipotle (CMG) used to be owned in part by McDonald’s (MCD). McDonald’s had originally taken a stake in Chipotle in February 1998, when Chipotle had but 14 restaurants in Denver. The maker of the Big Mac would go on to own 90% of the subsidiary and eventually spin it off in an initial public offering in January 2006. McDonald’s would receive ~$1.5 billion from the sale, but with Chipotle’s market capitalization now at over $20 billion, it’s clear the burger-and-fries behemoth exited way too early. The most recently-reported results by both restaurants tell the diverging story quite well. McDonald’s reported relatively disappointing second-quarter results Tuesday. The performance can best be described as flat. Global
Altria Raises Lower End of 2014 Earnings Guidance Range
July 22, 2014
Tobacco giant Altria (MO) reported second-quarter results Tuesday. The firm is one of the most widely-followed stocks on our website and is included in both the Best Ideas portfolio and Dividend Growth portfolio. Though Altria’s revenue expanded modestly, net of excise taxes, in the quarter thanks to the firm’s tremendous pricing power, cigarette smoking continues its steady and expected decline in the US. The company’s second-quarter adjusted domestic shipment cigarette volume dropped ~4% in the period, though its core brand Marlboro continues to increase its retail share of the total cigarette category (up 0.3 retail share points in the second quarter). Altria’s smokeless products segment fared better, growing both the top-line and operating income at a faster clip than the
Still Not Worried about Hasbro
July 21, 2014
It was December 2011, and our team was considering adding either Mattel (MAT) or Hasbro (HAS) to the Dividend Growth portfolio. We could only add one due to diversification considerations (both are consumer discretionary physical toy makers), and both had strong dividends and were undervalued. Hasbro, however, had a slightly better Dividend Cushion score, and we opted to include its shares in the portfolio instead of Mattel’s. Though we discussed a great many different things about both of the companies, we’ve been very pleased with the selection of Hasbro into the portfolio, and we credit the Dividend Cushion methodology for providing the incremental relative insight into the stock-selection process. Since its addition, Hasbro has leapt more than 60%, excluding dividend
